Interview with an Author (Kurt Vonnegut)

Subject: Interview with an Author (Kurt Vonnegut) March 2nd 2009, 4:56 am

I found a few articles I thought might be nice to share while reading online today. This one, is written by Kurt Vonnegut, who, by the way, was an incredible writer in my humble opinion. So, here. Seven steps to stylistic paradise.

1. Find a subject you care about.

Kurt Vonnegut wrote:

Quote :: Find a subject you care about and which you in your heart feel others should care about. It is this genuine caring, and not your games with language, which will be the most compelling and seductive element in your style.

I am not urging you to write a novel, by the way --- although I would not be sorry if you wrote one, provided you genuinely cared about something. A petition to the mayor about a pothole in front of your house or a love letter to the girl next door will do.

2. Do not ramble, though

Kurt Vonnegut wrote:

Quote :: I won't ramble on about that.

3. Keep it simple.

Kurt Vonnegut wrote:

Quote :: As for your use of language: Remember that two great masters of language, William Shakespeare and James Joyce, wrote sentences which were almost childlike when their subjects were most profound. "To be or not to be?" asks Shakespeare's Hamlet. The longest word is three letters long. Joyce, when he was frisky, could put together a sentence as intricate and as glittering as a necklace for Cleopatra, but my favorite sentence in his short story "Eveline" is this one: "She was tired." At that point in the story, no other words could break the heart of a reader as those three words do.

Simplicity of language is not only reputable, but perhaps even sacred. The Bible opens with a sentence well within the writing skills of a lively fourteen-year-old: "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."

4. Have guts to cut.

Kurt Vonnegut wrote:

Quote :: It may be that you, too, are capable of making necklaces for Cleopatra, so to speak. But your eloquence should be the servant of the ideas in your head. Your rule might be this: If a sentence, no matter how excellent, does not illuminate your subject in some new and useful way, scratch it out.

5. Sound like yourself.

Kurt Vonnegut wrote:

Quote :: The writing style which is most natural for you is bound to echo the speech you heard when a child. English was Conrad's third language, and much that seems piquant in his use of English was no doubt colored by his first language, which was Polish. And lucky indeed is the writer who has grown up in Ireland, for the English spoken there is so amusing and musical. I myself grew up in Indianapolis, where common speech sounds like a band saw cutting galvanized tin, and employs a vocabulary as unornamental as a monkey wrench.

In some of the more remote hollows of Appalachia, children still grow up hearing songs and locutions of Elizabethan times. Yes, and many Americans grow up hearing a language other than English, or an English dialect a majority of Americans cannot understand.

All these varieties of speech are beautiful, just as the varieties of butterflies are beautiful. No matter what your first language, you should treasure it all your life. If it happens to not be standard English, and if it shows itself when your write standard English, the result is usually delightful, like a very pretty girl with one eye that is green and one that is blue.

I myself find that I trust my own writing most, and others seem to trust it most, too, when I sound most like a person from Indianapolis, which is what I am. What alternatives do I have? The one most vehemently recommended by teachers has no doubt been pressed on you, as well: to write like cultivated Englishmen of a century or more ago.

6. Say what you mean.

Kurt Vonnegut wrote:

Quote :: I used to be exasperated by such teachers, but am no more. I understand now that all those antique essays and stories with which I was to compare my own work were not magnificent for their datedness or foreignness, but for saying precisely what their authors meant them to say. My teachers wished me to write accurately, always selecting the most effective words, and relating the words to one another unambiguously, rigidly, like parts of a machine. The teachers did not want to turn me into an Englishman after all. They hoped that I would become understandable --- and therefore understood. And there went my dream of doing with words what Pablo Picasso did with paint or what any number of jazz idols did with music. If I broke all the rules of punctuation, had words mean whatever I wanted them to mean, and strung them together higgledy-piggledy, I would simply not be understood. So you, too, had better avoid Picasso-style or jazz-style writing, if you have something worth saying and wish to be understood.

Readers want our pages to look very much like pages they have seen before. Why? This is because they themselves have a tough job to do, and they need all the help they can get from us.

7. Pity the readers.

Kurt Vonnegut wrote:

Quote :: They have to identify thousands of little marks on paper, and make sense of them immediately. They have to read, an art so difficult that most people don't really master it even after having studied it all through grade school and high school --- twelve long years.

So this discussion must finally acknowledge that our stylistic options as writers are neither numerous nor glamorous, since our readers are bound to be such imperfect artists. Our audience requires us to be sympathetic and patient readers, ever willing to simplify and clarify --- whereas we would rather soar high above the crowd, singing like nightingales.

That is the bad news. The good news is that we Americans are governed under a unique Constitution, which allows us to write whatever we please without fear of punishment. So the most meaningful aspect of our styles, which is what we choose to write about, is utterly unlimited.

I don't really have any comments about the things said by Kurt V, just thought it his thoughts were interesting and like I said I wanted to share it with you.

Subject: Addenda March 2nd 2009, 8:09 am

I often quote from Vonnegut in giving advice. My favorite quote, one that you missed, was, "Start as close to the end of the story as possible."

Subject: Re: Interview with an Author (Kurt Vonnegut) March 2nd 2009, 8:52 am

So you think starting the story closer to the ending helps you get through the beginning and middle?

I often start with an idea then build from there, mostly from the beginning, if at all possible, but usually starting in the middle and finding myself having to back track to the beginning then moving on to the ending.

Subject: Reply March 2nd 2009, 11:03 am

Well, another rule is that flashbacks are bad. There are many examples of a story doing well with flashbacks, but many, many more of stories having an "Oops, I forgot," mentality.

Anyway, yes, don't begin your story when there is no beginning. Remember that modern publishers are looking for hooks - something that will immediately catch a reader. This attitude is so prevalent that you see many poor writings start with dream sequences, 'flash forwards' where a future exciting point is presented, and other tricks attempting to establish a hook. A good writer simply starts his story where the actual story starts, working in character and scene details as the story moves forward.